Comments on: Sikkim Party comes under protection of local rights against Bihari’s in Sikkim

By: Birendra Dhakal

Birendra Dhakal — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:12:43 +0000

Sikkim Party comes under protection of local rights against Bihari’s in Sikkim

THINK FOR THIS BEFORE YOU SPEAK, BE A PERFECT WITH EVEDENCE, WE CAN WASH THE SITUATION, IF OUR RIGHT IS THERE, FOR OUR RIGHT YOUTH CAN DO ANYTHING, WE HAVE AN EXPERIENCE WHAT WE FACE OUT OF OUR STATE, BIRAJ ADHAKARIS THINKING IS GOOD FOR NEPALI , BUT ONLY BLOWING THE ISSUE WILL NOT WORK YOU HAVE TO PROVE IT, SO WE CAN FIGHT FOR TI HIS FOR TOMARROWS RESULT,

By: Chams_chamchey

Chams_chamchey — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:30:55 +0000

Sikkim did not join India to look after Biharis. There is Bihar the land of Biharis, so they screwed their own land and have come here to screw ours. Are we okay with that? that is the question.

By: Tashi

Tashi — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:52:09 +0000

let’s not be too racial out here……..our bihari brothers should rightfully get the benefits of all the centrally sponsored schemes and the sikkim govt should look into the matter.now coming into the local people problem i never thought there was any coz how many of us has seen a ration shop or a pan dokan shop or shops dealing with hardware materials with a LOCAL owner except for a few ration shops that too might be rare.Only the license of the shops are registered in the name of local people so how come the biharis are eating away our local economy…..

By: Bikash Rai

Bikash Rai — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:26:09 +0000

THAN WE ALL SUPPOSE THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN NARENDRA PRASAD PRADHAN ??????? OF THE PRASAD STOCK

By: Bikash Rai

Bikash Rai — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:24:25 +0000

Mr.Bhagwandas,

You may be right to some extent, but the title followed historically and religiously is of the father and not the mother for your kind information .

May be in some society they follow the title of the mother , but surely not the in the case of Mr. N.K. what?????.

By: Bagawandas

Bagawandas — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:49:57 +0000

Hi Bikash,
Everybody know that N.K. Pradhan is actually Bihari, he is from Prasad stock, but in sikkim … Lepcha becomes Rai, Pradhan becomes Lepcha , Lepcha becomes Bandhari bla bla.. not a big deal ! if you want , get Nepal citizenship also along with indian one. When a Tibetan refugee can take all the advantages simply by writting Bhutia… who cares.? when tibetan of north Sikkim can become Lepcha leader … nothing to get surprised….!
If govt. has any guts let them constitute a Committee to look into such matter.

By: Bikash Rai

Bikash Rai — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:12:09 +0000

BLAME IT ON CHAMLING ….THE POWER PROJECTS …HEY N.K. PRADHAN IS ACTUALLY A BIHARI …..IS IT SO ….ANY GUESSES, PLEASE.

By: sikkimey dai

sikkimey dai — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:59:36 +0000

Nepali kanchha bhai lai sujao…, Beeraj lai nepal ko na.ba.nu hai, sikkim kahiley pani nepal ko tukra thiheyna. Nepal lai ta nepali afai afno raja marera TURA bako po ta. Sikkim ama ani tetaka aru jati lai dannyabad denu, na bul nu hai. meleyra busnu purcha hai.
Bechara kancha.

By: nepali kanchha

nepali kanchha — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:29:15 +0000

sala dhoti haru le nepal ma hamro nepali daju bhai lai nai minorities banai diyo aba aafu le gumay ko hamro priya nepal ko tukra sikkim lai dhoti le india banayo feri nepali bhashi hamro gorkhali harulai aafnai desh ma dhoti bihari ghusayara mainorities banauna khoje ko chha patek nepali le birod garnu parchha ani hamro beeraj adhikari le ek dam thik bhannu bhako ho

By: T-b-room

T-b-room — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:56:07 +0000

biraj just tell me where did ur grandfather come from to sikkim………yeah to grow oranges and anichi cardanums in our land than as bihari population u took our land.